you can just say "websearch" instead of "google"
there is more than one search engine
don't internalize the brands' language
@polychrome also works but i'd like other alternatives besides DuckDuckGo to take off (even tho that's what i use. but don't egg your baskets or whatever. don't wanna have to clean egg goo off.)
@grainloom honestly "look it up" sounds so much better than "google it" anyway like google is a fun word to say once and then it gets old
@dragon that could work, but "websearch" is more specific imho, it implies the use of some indexing service
@grainloom on the other hand, if googling becomes like hoover they could lose their brand name which could be neat
@grainloom you can also culture jam it if you're feeling clever. as an example:
- "okay google how to delete someone else's post"
- "okay ecosia how to recycle someone else's post"
@grainloom you should also just be able to say Google because that language is more accessible without getting scrutinized by techies.
@grainloom I can partly agree, it's uncomfortable and weird to say "googling" for things. It doesn't feel right. But as some others in the thread here have said (@spacekookie) they can loose their brand.
In Sweden we used to have a brand named "Mack", it was a gas-station brand. They established that good that everyone still say that they go to a "Mack" to re-fuel their car. But the brand "Mack" haven't been seen for the past 30 years (got sold and sold and sold again).
"Google" means to websearch within the limits of what google allows. it's like riding a bicycle very fast down a narrow path between two hedges full of thorns and poisoned berries.
@grainloom On the other hand, using it generically has (or soon will) remove their trademark, because it will be known as a common word - like xerox or kleenex. That's why goog insists ppl capitalise it. If you do use it, NEVER capitalise it!
In any case, search with duck duck go or yandex - anything but the Borg's own search engine.
@grainloom Galaxy brain: If you use it to mean searches on not-Google enough Google will lose their copyright
@grainloom I agree but also think there is value in destroying a tradename/trademark by making it generic (e.g., kleenex is now included in many dictionaries as a generic terms that refers to ANY brand of facial tissue). IP lawyers hate this one weird trick (even though marketers probably love it, so I'm kinda torn, tbh).
I enjoy watching people 🤯 when I tell them I was googling something on the Bing.
Using the brand as the generic is one of the few ways we the people can usurp a brand's power. Trademark law says we can "win" the brand if we genericize it. Force the company to rebrand if they want to hold a valid trademark. It's a tiny win, of course, but a win people have long tried to hold over corporations.
@grainloom I see a lot of people talking about trademark genericization, and unfortunately they are all wrong, because genericide doesn't work that way. Not only do consumers have to use the mark to refer to competitors, the registrar must not take legal action to protect their mark, and it would help if (extending the first requirement) an "average consumer" would be unaware that it even is a protected trademark or have no generic term to substitute even if they are.
@grainloom Google has sent letters to publications requesting that they do not use the term generically, and so far no competitors have actually adopted the name (which Google would be required to sue to protect their mark when they become aware of them, or lose their protection). So, "Google" is not at any risk of losing their trademark, as happy as it would make us all to see that.
@grainloom On the subject of people not even knowing that a seemingly generic term is a trademark, you should generally keep quiet if you do learn of such a case. Because if you tell people about the brand, you are actually strengthening their case for them for free. For that reason, I won't provide any such examples even though I read a list of dozens of them. If the company wants people to know that they own the mark, they should have to spend their own money on that.
@grainloom honestly i have ddg as my default and it sucks so hard i very often have to use google - i kind of wish it and bing didnt exist, so google would have to face monopoly regulation like it ahould
@grainloom ironically if you do use "Google" as a verb then Google run the risk of losing their trademark due to brand name genericization
@TerrorBite has been suggested before, probably wouldn't make a difference at this point if they did
@grainloom Both you and Google want the same thing for different reasons, it just amuses me.
the mastodon instance at cybre.space is retired
see the end-of-life plan for details: https://cybre.space/~chr/cybre-space-eol