The only exception is Zelda II, which was written as a sequel to The Legend of Zelda in the same way that the Book of Mormon is a sequel to the Bible. It's accepted as canon by a small group of zealous devotees, but it's just an interesting footnote to everyone else.
Hyrule Historia is the King James Bible of the Zelda mythos: it's a quasi-official version of the legend released by a ruling body who claims to have the authority to do this, but it's just as flawed as any other interpretation. Some people with a need for organizational certainty accept that HH is the real, official version of the legend and that's that, but the story of Link, like the story of Jesus, transcends any one text.
@matt yes but kjv must be the right bible version
because in the musical joseph has a coloured coat
and kjv is the only one where his coat is coloured
therefore it cant not be the most accurate
@matt on a more serious, i like a lot of what youve just said, but i think that the most important aspect of the king james is that it was in english. i dont know how thatd fit into the analogy, but it was only by enforcing it as the correct interpretation that the english version got any real uptake.
thats how i see it anyway. i dont think the great bible or the bishop bible got pushed as much, which meant that priests could continue to keep bollocking their congregations.
@twee Yeah, I'm not really up on my bible history, so I'm sure this is a gross oversimplification, but I appreciate the thoughtful reply!
ｃｙｂｒｅｓｐａｃｅ: the social hub of the information superhighway
jack in to the mastodon fediverse today and surf the dataflow through our cybrepunk, slightly glitchy web portal