long-read, climate change, attitudes
So in August the New York Times Magazine published a long, long article on how climate change has been open knowledge since 1979.
But what I'm interested in is its conclusion — it, essentially, argues all the reader can do now is adapt and hope, that clearly nothing's working to actually change policy. And I wonder if this is a broader attitudinal shift, a cognitive leap over "democracy isn't solving this problem through discussion"...?
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/08/01/magazine/climate-change-losing-earth.html
Btw you can get old macOS wallpapers in 5k resolution. They still look really good
https://512pixels.net/projects/default-mac-wallpapers-in-5k/
#introductions Hi there, I'm Mat. I make interactive media and experimental narrative games. They can be found at http://aether.in.net.
I used to study film and I still like to dive into esoterics. I'm also a bit of a weeb. I'm interested in gentle indie pop and cyberpunk + political theory, especially the CCRU.
Inadvertently I discovered there's a really beautiful macOS matrix app. https://neilalexander.eu/seaglass
Landian edgyness and trans female supremacy
Hi,
Nick Land -> Nyx Land(???) is fucking writing about Gender Accelerationism now???
It's the Itch sale, by the way, so if you're in the mood for a ~2-3 hour, multiple window internet simulator in the post-singularity, Subserial Network is $6.69, which is pretty nice.
Technomystic of the cybernetic left. Interactive media artist with http://aether.in.net. Avatar by @aurahack.