Google Glass was an interesting case because it showed us people do care about privacy, but only when they feel it's violated.

They will give endless data on themselves and others including photos, video and location but they will outrage the moment they feel privacy is actually at risk - because someone has a camera on their face instead of their hands.

Facebook is actually very clever to obtain all this data without triggering this sensation for the average person.

People know.. but they do not *feel*.

@polychrome what about people who didn't like Glass because it was pretentious silicon valley hipster bs

@a_breakin_glass @polychrome ironically i thought google glass was a really cool thing (in theory) because i already wear glasses and it would be nice to have information at a glance

i played around with a smartwatch and it felt annoying to have to put an extra thing on my wrist and the whole time i was wishing it was on my face instead

i didn't care for the camera on it too much but idk why people don't have the same reaction to smartphones in hands?

@trwnh @a_breakin_glass I love my smartwatch but I agree about wanting data right up in my field of vision!

Trouble with Glass was the design (and the fact it was a crummy prototype billed at hipsters didnt help). It was too conspicuous and they kept promoting the privacy-invasive feature of "take a photo at any point whenever" which did creep people out.

For this to work the camera needs to be inconspicuous and the device more fashionable. Intel's "looks like normal glasses" spin was the best one so far.

Follow

@polychrome @trwnh I guess the EyeTap is an interesting concept for that too. be great if it was an actual thing.

@a_breakin_glass @trwnh I consider Dr. Steve Mann to be a real life mad scientist. ❤️

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Cybrespace

cybrespace: the social hub of the information superhighway

jack in to the mastodon fediverse today and surf the dataflow through our cybrepunk, slightly glitchy web portal