Letās play a #game of #rank the following #DNS providers from #least to #most #trustworthy:
⢠8.8.8.8 (#Google)
⢠Your #ISP
⢠1.1.1.1 (#Cloudflare)
⢠9.9.9.9 (#IBM?)
@USBloveDog Trustworthy in which way?
I'd guess ISP is least trustworthy, just because so many of them are Comcast and Comcast has been known to do stupid crap with the DNS before, like replace NXDOMAIN with 'site finder'.
Google and Cloudflare are very likely to return accurate results competently.
Both will probably analyze the heck out of the queries people are sending to them, but I don't really have much reason to care that they do.
@Azure @USBloveDog Another consideration is that your ISP can still do that even if you use alternate DNS providers, even on encrypted connections the hostname is transmitted in cleartext for technical reasons (TLS-SNI)
@USBloveDog Thinking about it a bit more I don't really /like/ the idea of having everyone use a DNS resolution service run under a single administrative domain of control.
Even if your ISP isn't trustwrothy because it's Comcast, having lots of hierarchical DNS caches open to the public so people can find and use one that is network-local to them wouldn't be /bad/.
This is sort of an Internet Architecture that was big in the 90s and I'm sort of sad it fell by the wayside.
@USBloveDog Way back when, universities and such were setting up big hierarchies of web proxies, for example. Where the big state universities or consortia like MERIT might run a big squid server and smaller universities might build on that, with community colleges in the area building on that, along with libraries, etc.
HTTPS Everywhere sort of kills that idea off (in some ways I'm sad that there wasn't more thought put into authenticated-but-not-encrypted for public resources.)
@USBloveDog Though it was dying off anyway. Partially because people started assuming all content was dynamic and partly because things like CDNs and Akami and whatnot sort of took the model and turned it inside out and made it provider-centric.
@USBloveDog I have hosted my own DNS servers for many years, after ISPs started doing wildcard shenanigans to show their own pages when you mis typed www addresses.
Regardless of how trustworthy a DNS provider is I kind of cringe at the thought of embracing services like 1.1.1.1, 8.8 8.8 and 9.9.9.9 because DNS should be highly distributed not centralized with mega providers which further damages the Internet.
Hey fuck you why arenāt those #hashtags working? Is this a #client or a #Masto bug?