I think I would expect a true light field display to work like a planar fourier capture array but in reverse

basically each pixel has a ton of micro-pixels, that emit light in different spread harmonics. you can imagine each pixel being sent a fourier transform of the shape of light that should be emitting from it

you should read about PFCAs, they're fucking fascinating. flat camera with no lens that can be fabbed with the same technology we use to make CPUs en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planar_F

"angle sensitive pixel" is what each micro-pixel that I spoke about is. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angle-se

the article only speaks about it in terms of receiving light, not emitting light. I'm not a physicist but I feel like, maybe it should work both ways?

I have no idea how small you can make an LED so that it fits behind the diffraction grating


I'm surprised that all the angle-sensitive pixel research seems to only be about lightfield capture and not display. you can build a large scale one really easily with moire patterns. I guess the massive problem is scaling down

· · Web · 2 · 0 · 1

you know what, I actually bet the fatal flaw would be that the emitters would be too dim to be visible

@SuricrasiaOnline how can it be a massive problem if you're trying to make it smaller? checkmate liberals :ms_shark_think:

@SuricrasiaOnline probably "when optoelectronics saves moore's law", if that ever happens, doing this kinda thing will get a lot easier and the whole thing will be implemented using lasers or something

Sign in to participate in the conversation

cybrespace: the social hub of the information superhighway jack in to the mastodon fediverse today and surf the dataflow through our cybrepunk, slightly glitchy web portal support us on patreon or liberapay!