made a new version of lisp where everything is exactly the same but instead of () it uses <> for, quote, "aerodynamic purposes"
@HTHR <gotta<go<fast>>>
@HTHR this is the only way template metaprogramming is able to exist within the otherwise wind-resistant C++
@HTHR so um... do you use () for less than and greater than or.....?
@bea nah you still use <>
@HTHR ....................................................................................................
@bea hey why is my code getting errors
@HTHR better than smalltalk; that language is boxier than a 70s car
@HTHR Which parenthesis style do you prefer for your lisp ?
- ( classic )
- [ blocky ]
- { curly }
- < aerodynamic >
- ≤ mathematic ≥
- « French-speaking »
- » German-speaking «
- ¿ interrogative ?
- ¡ exclamative !
- …many others not mapped on my keyboard…
@Feufochmar @HTHR
- ~ ambiguous ~
@Feufochmar @HTHR
- “English-speaking”
- ☙ romantic ❧
- 🐱 rainy 🐶
- 🤛 fight 🤜
@Feufochmar @HTHR
- 🤦 OwO who wrote this? 👊
@Feufochmar
“writer”
`confusing' (although this notation is often used to emulate apostrophes in the ASCII world)
‹ tiny aerodynamic ›
† religious ‡
@HTHR
@HTHR
my version of lisp transforms (display "stuff") into <display>stuff</display>
@HTHR does that make it run faster? 
@Earthnuker no but the launch time is *amazing*
@HTHR my lisp has downforce, does yours XD